Homeowners for Justice & an end to unlawful Repossessions By UK based bankrupt Lehman Bros Entities
Thursday June 20th 2013

And so…back to the beginning



As has often been stated on many other forums on securitisation Capstone Mortgage Services administer the mortgage or loan, not on behalf of the originators such as SPPL, SPML or Preferred but on behalf of the SPE or SPV (Special Purposes Entity or Special Purposes Vehicle.)

The SPV  purchased the loan and mortgage book from the originator with the aim of marketing the underlying collateral and security (that’s your house and mine) as an investment. the SPPL/SPML etc brands are dead in the water and were the minute they stopped lending and then selling on or securitising your mortgage. That was all they ever existed for. Hell they didn’t even collect. That was left to our good friends at Capstone.

The SPV then took whole tranches of mortgages, bundled them together (called pools) and issued them as notes.

These investments were marketed in the prospectuses as being particularly attractive to investors.

1. They were rated by the rating agencies as more or less AAA, or AAB and the ratings agencies were incentivised to do so given that their client was the SPV. No conflict of interest there then.

2. The high rate of return (that is screwing you and me into the ground with exorbitant interest rates) created a steady flow of lots of cash for everyone involved in the securitisation process. Ever thought that interest rates of 5% were just pure greed on behalf of your original lender when the BoE base rate and the LIBOR are at historically low levels? Think again. Everyone in the chain needs their cash. It has little or nothing to do with your credit worthiness. That is just a guilt trip, and one of many they will lay at your door to get you thinking that it’s all your fault. Note how they are always talking about your obligations, never theirs.

3. Enforced early redemption of the security, that is stripping out the equity in your home through falsely premised repossession claims. Typically the prospectus boasts that they investors will have the notes redeemed within about 5 years not the 20 or 25 years you AND THEY contracted to.

As the Lehman’s Ghosts are exorcised by Price Waterhouse Coopers, the role of Capstone becomes even more pivotal. You see they don’t really act on behalf of SPML at all.

That is just a cover story to keep the cash flowing, to apply the charges and make and their own handsome profits from unlawfully gotten gains, and ultimately to issue proceedings against you in court for possession of your home and your equity.

The SPV wants no illumination of its regulation avoidance and especially its tax dodging.

After all who would pay tax if they could find a legal way around it?  Especially if that way happens to be sanctioned by the Treasury when a certain G.Brown was Chancellor of the Exchequer. So in fact what we have is the very department charged with revenue and excise advising and regulating in such a way as to allow UK registered companies to avoid paying UK tax. All very neat.

In the Treasury Select Committee section of this blog read Carmel Butler’s submission which details the tax avoidance structures which were essentially green lighted by the Treasury in 2002. Don’t just take my word for it. Have a read of this.

http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/clarification-on-securitisation-issues-welcomed/87673.article

I particulalry like the bit about consumers not needing to be confused with all this. I don’t feel confused at all. In fact clarity illuminates and I now perfectly understand why Capstone Mortgage Services cannot treat customers fairly.

THEY ARE ENTIRELY BEHOLDEN TO THE RAPACIOUS DEMANDS OF THE SPV.

4 Comments for “And so…back to the beginning”

  • capstonewatch says:

    Oh what a tangled web they weave!

    How I wish I was a full time investigative reporter. I am fortunate in the sense that my job makes this kind of digging possible, but not always, and unfortunate in that my work is very demanding. So it’s a double edged sword.

    Digests and contributions are gratefully received though. Especially from you BOZ and your magical way with wordz. I will happily cut and paste and create a category. Perhaps I should name the category. The Philanthropy of the Jackal!

  • Boz says:

    Capstone, have you done any research on the fact the spv’s are wholly owned by charitable trusts (as stated in spml annual report) ?

    The charity commission says a charity/charitable trust must have a charitable purpose and be for the public benefit.

    that would seem to make spml to be acting criminally, don’t you think ?

    If that is the case then maybe a few people can be arrested on criminal charges ?

  • THE Mad Hatter says:

    so it looks like the jackals are turning on themselves. not surprising amoral maggotfarmas.

    http://www.lse.co.uk/regulatory-news-article.asp?shareprice=&ArticleCode=73k923eu&ArticleHeadline=Important_Notice_to_Noteholders

    the most important point is that the Issuer(SPV) is asking the court to adjudicate if the SPV is insolvent, which the Trustee on behalf of the noteholders(investors)is claiming. no shit. as stated:

    Insolvency Act 1986

    Section 123(2) (as amended by Condition 9(a)(iii)) of the Act states:

    “A company is also deemed unable to pay its debts if the value of the company’s assets is less than the amount of its liabilities, taking into account its contingent and prospective liabilities.”

    Further accounts available

    Any Noteholder wishing to receive a copy of the Issuer’s (unaudited) management accounts as at 30 November 2009 may request the same from the Trustee using the contact details set out at the bottom of this notice.

    there are many reported cases now with investors(noteholders) taking the SPV to court, effectively the Trustee taking action on their behalf; so they can get hold of the mortgage assets-YOUR house as per the Trust Deed(m395). the ‘Vulture Fund’ scenario, whereby they retain CROOKLYN as 3rd party administrator.(OP).

    TMH

  • imogen says:

    Hatter this was always the end game scenario and should have happened when Lehmans went under.The government would have been forced to step in as they did with RBS etc
    instead Lehman victims as here were shoved into a corner,forced to fend for themslves and forgotten whilst the rapacious remaining Lehman entities sucked every penny they could out of them legally or illegaly ,lining their own pockets until they folded themselves.


Leave a Comment

More from category

Financial Services Authority Business Plan 2010-2011 (2 down, 5 to go…)

Once again we return to a particular bug bear of this blog and that is the breathtaking complacency of the Financial [Read More]

Who comes calling, who claims…?

My thanks to a fellow digger for noticing this listed for hearing before the Supreme Court. Southern Pacific Securities [Read More]

Sub-prime Kensington’s 16,000 FSA rule breaches…all of them fair no doubt.

UNBELIEVABLE…HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU EVEN BEGIN TO PUT THIS INTO ANY SORT OF PERSPECTIVE? SIXTEEN THOUSAND BREACHES [Read More]

Be Very Afraid…Those "Fair" Charges in full

The ever decreasing plausibility with which the awful CAPSTONE MORTGAGES pleads the fairness of its charging regimes is [Read More]

The Fall Of Lehman Brothers

The title is self explanatory; There are six parts of some 9-10 minutes each. This is an excellent documentary. [Read More]

A Manifesto

We aim:

1. To name and shame Capstone Mortgage Services as a disgraceful Third Party Administrator which specialises in ripping people off before dispossessing them.

2. To highlight the appalling practices of this firm which are systemic and unlawful and which cause huge consumer detriment.

3. To highlight the fact of insolvent trading by the Lehman Bros entities including SPML, SPPL, and PML; to further highlight their failure to comply with their legal responsibilities to submit accounts or appoint directors.

4. To challenge the locus standi of Capstone Mortgage Services to issue claim on behalf of the originating lender.

5. To campaign and lobby the regulators such as the Financial Services Authority to halt these abuses NOW, by applying the law and regulations as they exist.

6. To assist anyone in the process of fighting unlawful, falsely premised and vexatious repossession claims to mount a viable defence.

7. To campaign for fairer hearings before the courts in repossession claims than the anecdotal evidence suggests is currently the case.

8. To encourage in the media wider reporting of the fall-out for thousands of British families and households of the Lehman Bros bankruptcy.

9. To alert all concerned that the cynical makeover from Capstone to Acenden is nothing more than a PR rebranding exercise and has if anything resulted in more of the same from this appalling 'mortgage servicer.'

This is not just our manifesto. It is yours too. Feel free to post up suggestions and they will be considered for inclusion.


FSA Principle 6

" A firm must pay due regard to the interests of consumers and treat them fairly"

Securitisation and Fair Treatment – As stated by the FSA

In terms of the issues raised around securitisation, we expect a firm to adopt the same approach to forbearance for borrowers with mortgages that have been securitised as for borrowers whose mortgages remain on the firm’s books. Securitisation covenants should not constrict a firm’s ability to treat its customers fairly by exercising appropriate forbearance strategies.

Whither Deterrence..?

Margaret Cole, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA said:

"FSA rules ensure that financial services firms operate safely, protecting both their customers and the industry itself. Anyone found flouting those rules will face stiff penalties."

Really? Or did you mean THIS:

When I use a word,' said.... in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

FOS Complaints STATS Courtesy of Dingle.

SPML 56% found in favour of complainant

1 July 2009 – 31 December 2009 – new cases

Kensington 50
SPML 56

1 July 2009 – 31 December 2009 – resolved cases

Kensington 50% resolved in favour of complainant
SPML 40% resolved in favour of complainant

1 January 2009 – 30 June 2009 – new cases

GMAC 54
Kensington 70
Preferred Mortgages 31
SPML 92

1 January 2009 – 30 June 2009 – resolved cases

GMAC 74% resolved in favour of complainant
Kensington 37% resolved in favour of complainant
Preferred 56% resolved in favour of complainant
SPML 48% resolved in favour of complainant

SPPL’s VAT (Yeah…I’m the Taxman…)

Direct from SPPL's Tariffs and Charges 2010

"All fees and charges are inclusive of VAT where applicable."

Now, where did we put those SPPL Accounts...?

s.27 of the Land Registry Act 2002

From the many prospectuses...

"Neither the Issuer nor the Trustee currently intend to effect any registration at The Land Registry of England and Wales, the Registers of Northern Ireland or any registration or recording in the Registers of Scotland to protect the sale of the Loans"

Why not? It is a legal requirement that they do so and any failure amounts to a criminal offence.

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031